Garold D. Oberlender. 2000. SECOND
EDITION. PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR
ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION. McGraw -Hill Higher Education.
WORKING WITH MULTIPLE TEAMS
As a
project progresses through design into construction, the work of the owner's,
designer's,
and contractor's teams must merge into a collective effort. Although
each of
these teams have their own objectives, the diverse expertise that each
possesses
must converge into an overlapping environment
p.19
CONSTRUCTION TEAMS
The work
environment and culture of a construction project is unique compared to
most
working conditions. A typical construction project consists of groups of
people, normally from several organizations, that are hired and assigned to a
project to build the facility. Due to the relatively short life of a
construction project, these people may view the construction project as
accomplishing short-term tasks. However, the project manager of the
construction team must instill in the team that building long-term relationships
is more important in career advancement than trying to accomplish short-term
tasks
p. 21
The
number of construction teams for a project depends upon the number of contracts
awarded by the owner. For each construction contractor, and subsequent tier of subcontractors,
a construction team is formed to perform the work in accordance with the
contract documents issued by the owner.
P. 22
Number of Contracts
One
As
illustrated above, the number of contracts can vary from one to many, depending
on the chosen method of project delivery. For D/B/B projects, the owner awards
contracts to two parties: one to a designer, who may contract some of the
design work to other design firms, and one to the construction contractor, who
may contract to numerous subcontractors who perform special construction work.
For D/B projects, the owner awards a contract to one party: the DIB firm, who
may in turn subcontract to many contractors. For CM projects, the owner awards
contracts to three parties: the construction manager, designer, and
construction contractor. Under this scenario, there may be many subcontracts
awarded under each of these three principal parties.
P.365
Contractual Relationship
A
contractor may be viewed as an agent or vendor. An agent represents the owner's
interest,
works for a fee, and usually is selected based on qualifications. A vendor
delivers
a specified product or service, works for a price, and generally is selected
based on
price
p.265
THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS
ROLES AND LEGAL RELATIONSHIPS -THE
STATUTORY CONTEXT
Peter Aeberli
RIBA,
ARIAS, ACE, FCIArb, Barrister
Chartered
Arbitrator, Adjudicator, Registered CEDR Mediator
PART A:
THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS
1. The
nature and extent of construction activity
Construction
activity extends from, at one extreme, the individual house for a private
client
to, at the other, new hospitals or shopping developments. It encompasses
buildings,
engineering works, such as sewers and bridges, and major infrastructure
projects,
such as airports and trunk roads. Arguably, the defining characteristic of the
construction
process is that it concerns the procuring of purpose built solutions to client
needs,
not the purchase of “off the shelf” products.1
2. The
persons involved
Those
involved in the construction process include:
- The
client, the employer;
- Design
consultants – principally architects and engineers (civil, structural,
mechanical
and electrical);
-
Quantity surveyors;
- Contract
administrators (employer’s representatives);
- CDM
Co-ordinators (formerly planning supervisors) and principal contractors
(see the
Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 (“the CDM
Regulations”));
-
Contractors, sub-contractors and specialist contractors (“specialists”).
-
Regulatory authorities – principally planning authorities (always a local
authority)
and
building control authorities (usually, but not necessarily a local authority).
-
Specialist agencies, such as the Health and Safety Executive and the
Environment
Agency.
There
are, in addition, funders, purchasers and tenants, and users.
SUB-CONTRACTING
Vicarious
performance (sub-contracting) does not generally relieve the original contracting
party of its obligations. This is so even where the obligation is one of skill
and care
and an apparently competent person is used/engaged for the design work in question,
consider Moresk Cleaners Ltd v. Hicks
[1966] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 338
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.