AES adalah
singkatan kepada Automated Enforcement System, atau Sistem Penguatkuasaan
Berautomat.
Cuba baca
cerita berikut:
Pada 2
November 2012, saya sedang memandu dari arah Seremban ke arah Pulau Pinang,
menggunakan Lebuhraya Utara-Selatan. Sekitar jam 11 pagi, semasa saya sedang
memandu di lorong kiri, di satu kawasan di selatan Perak, saya melihat sebuah
kereta BMW hitam yang dipandu "agak laju" (sebab pada masa itu saya
melihat meter kelajuan kenderaan saya sekitar 108km/j dan BMW tersebut meluncur
memotong laju di kanan saya), diekori rapat oleh sebuah lagi MPV mewah, tak
silap saya jenis toyota. Tiba-tiba BMW tersebut memperlahankan kenderaannnya
secara mengejut, menyebabkan kenderaan yang mengekor rapat di belakangnya
membrek mengejut (kerana saya terdengan bunyi kesan tayar dibrek mengejut
kriieeekk...), dan tiba-tiba saya melihat satu nyalaan lampu cerah dari arah
tepi jalan di kiri saya, yang saya lihat rupa-rupanya, kamera AES!!!
Fuuuh..kemalangan yang hampir berlaku kerana sikap pemandu? atau kerana AES?
Cuba
analisis analogi berikut:
Sebuah
bas atau sebuah lori, mengikut undang-undang pengangkutan, hanya boleh dipandu
paling laju 90km/j di lebuhraya. Jika bas atau lori tersebut dipandu 109km/j,
maka AES masih tidak dapat mengesan "kesalahan" mamandu melebihi 110
km/j kerana bas atau lori tersebut dipandu tidak melebihi 110km/j. Jadi,
pemandu bas atau lori (kedua-duanya jenis "raja jalan") tersebut "terlepas" daripada tindakan
undang-undang kerana memandu melebihi had laju yang dibenarkan, walhal bas atau
lori tersebut memang telahpun dipandu "melebihi had laju dibenarkan",
kan?
Cuba
selami pengalaman saya ini...
Pada 2
November 2012, saya sedang memandu dari arah Seremban ke arah Pulau Pinang,
menggunakan Lebuhraya Utara-Selatan. Sekitar jam 9 pagi, semasa saya sekitar
kawasan Putrajaya, tiba-tiba 4 ekor (saya ulang, "ekor")
motosikal besar berkuasa tinggi "mencilok beberapa kenderaan termasuk
kenderaan saya dengan melalui sisi kiri dan kanan kenderaan-kenderaan (yang
pada masa itu agak banyak) dan melalui lorong kiri dan kanan, lagak berlumba di
litar lumba, dengan "amat laju" macam pelesit!!!! Adakah, AES "mampu"
menguatkuasakan had laju kepada 4 ekor penunggang ini yang menunggang dengan
amat membahaya dan bukan dengan lagak manusia???
Cuba baca
berita berikut:
18
November 2012 | last updated at 08:56AM
Attitude
U-turn with AES
By
NURADILLA NOORAZAM | news@nst.com.my 0 comments
KUALA LUMPUR:
AN expert on the controversial Automated Enforcement System (AES) has denounced
a suggestion put forth by consultants hired by the Pakatan Rakyat coalition
that the system should only be enforced when the country's annual road
fatalities reach 30,000.
A leading
authority in the Intelligent Transport System (ITS), Dr Khoriri Mohd Dimyati,
said the 6,877 deaths a year are an overwhelming number for the country's
population of 28 million.
"According
to a research conducted by Malaysia Institute of Road Safety Research (Miros)
last year, over 17 people die in road accidents every day.
"If
we want to wait until there are 30,000 deaths per year, that would mean 80
deaths per day. What would happen to the population?"
He said
the country would suffer if no efforts were made to curb the fatal accident
rates, notwithstanding Miros's research on road fatalities last year also
stated that the country incurs losses up to RM1.2 million for each road
fatality.
The
30,000 threshold was among suggestions by the Pakatan-appointed consultants
that were published in an online news portal on Wednesday, and comparisons were
also drawn between road fatality cases in Malaysia and of highly-populated
countries like India and Indonesia.
In
dismissing the suggestion, Khoriri claimed that some advanced countries have
adopted the AES despite experiencing fewer road fatalities than Malaysia,
citing Sweden as an example where the AES was implemented after just one
roadside accident.
The
Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) lecturer added that the North European nation,
with a population of nine million, experiences only two road fatalities per
year since the AES was brought in.
Malaysia
implemented the AES on Sept 23, but this decision has been met with backlash
from various quarters, particularly from the opposition coalition.
In
addition, the summons at RM300 was regarded as burdensome to the people.
Khoriri, however, pointed out that the implementation of AES was not about
issuing summonses.
"The
AES was designed to create a healthier and safer driving attitude among road
users, driven by the 'POBC' concept -- the Perception of Being Caught.
"Just
imagine when there is a roadblock up ahead or a traffic officer. Drivers would
immediately check their seatbelts and put away their mobile phones.
"They
would not want to get caught breaking any traffic laws and this is what we want
the system to do, to create this attitude. So instead of placing enforcement
officers, we use cameras, which are more cost-effective," he said.
The
Newcastle University graduate said the system would address limitations of
insufficient number of enforcement officers.
He said
that previous traffic operations were only able to bring about 40 per cent POBC
awareness among drivers, compared to 25 per cent when there is no operation,
adding that he is confident the AES would generate 75 to 80 per cent POBC
awareness in the long run.
In Kuala
Terengganu, A. Azim Idris reported that the Congress of Unions of Employees in
the Public and Civil Services (Cuepacs) has called on the Road and Transport
Department to provide a briefing on the AES.
Cuepacs
president Datuk Omar Osman said while the union was not opposed to the system,
he was concerned whether summonses would be issued to government drivers caught
speeding while driving government vehicles.
"If
they (the drivers) are caught on camera, they would be the ones who would have
to foot the bill, not their offices or bosses," he said, adding that as
drivers were sometimes instructed to exceed the speed limit by employers who were
rushing to appointments.
He added
the matter would be brought up at the Health Ministry Drivers Union meeting in
Johor soon.
Read
more: Attitude U-turn with AES - General - New Straits Times
http://www.nst.com.my/nation/general/attitude-u-turn-with-aes-1.172866#ixzz2CXGXxt8N
Persoalan: Berapa
peratuskah daripada jumlah kematian atau kemalangan tersebut yang
"disumbangkan" oleh memandu melebihi had laju? Sudahkah dikaji juga,
dan diambil cara berkesan pemandu yang memandu semasa tidak sesuai memandu (mabuk,
sakit, terlalu letih dll)?, memotong di sebelah kiri, memotong sewewang-wenang
(kerana aku besar, aku hebat dll.) walaupun terdapat kereta yang datang dari
hadapan, membuat pusingan U secara tiba-tiba, termasuk oleh kenderaan agensi
penguatkuasa sendiri, melanggar lampu isyarat, memotong di garisan berkembar,
dan sebagainya?
Bagaimana
pula jumlah kemalangan yang berlaku akibat kecuaian pihak lain, misalnya semasa
kerja membaiki jalan (dan kurang/tiada langkah keselamatan kepada pemandu
dilaksanakan), rekabentuk jalan yang tidak wajar, perletakan tanda lalulintas
yang bercelaru, jalan rosak yang tidak diambil tindakan responsif segera,
halangan di jalan yang diluar jangkaan pemandu seperti haiwan melintas, banjir
kilat, jalan runtuh dll, mutu jalan yang rendah (bahan, ketebalan,
benjol-benjol dll), , dan sebagainya?
Lihat contoh berikut tentang "kecelaruan" tanda isyarat lalulintas (gambar dirakam pada jam10.35 pagi 19 November 2012, di km 8, jalan Simpang Pulai-Kampung Raja, Cameron Highlands)
Sebelum ini, pemandu diarahkan memandu tidak lebih 6o km/j, dan kemudian terserempak dengan tanda isyarat "boleh memandu tidak lebih 90 km/j", tetapi tiba-tiba di hadapan sekitar 20 meter, terpampang tanda had laju 50 km/j!!!!
Cuba baca
berita ini, yang jika benar, tentunya "mendebarkan" hati SETIAP
pemandu, termasuk saya...
A blunder
by the AES (Automated Enforcement System) control centre in Perak caused a
factory manager in Penang to be erroneously slapped with a speeding summons,
Sin Chew Daily reported yesterday.
To rub
salt into the wound, state Road Transport Department (RTD) officials he
approached gave him the runaround and eventually told him to write to their
director-general to resolve the matter.
Factory
manager CK Leong, who drives a black Toyota Harrier with plate number PKR 181,
received the summons on Oct 18 stating that his vehicle was captured going at
145kmph at Km204.6 of the North-South Expressway at 12.34pm on Oct 10.
Upon
checking the summons, he found that the actual vehicle caught speeding was a
white Toyota Camry with the number plate PKR 1811.
The
ticket indicated that Leong must settle the compound fine of RM300 by Dec 11,
failing which he will have to appear at the magistrate’s court in Taiping on
Jan 7.
Leong,
34, said he approached the local RTD office but none of the officers knew how
to deal with the matter although he brought his vehicle along and pointed out to
them the glaring error in the AES summons.
The
officers gave him the address of the RTD director-general in Putrajaya and told
him to write to explain his case.
An irate
Leong told a press conference at Bukit Mertajam on Sunday that apart from
writing to the RTD chief, he had also lodged a police report.
Padang
Lalang assemblyman Tan Cheong Heng said it was a clear case of human error
committed by the AES control centre in Perak which obtained Leong’s particulars
from the RTD’s database.
He said
the centre should have checked and compared the colour and make of Leong’s
vehicle with the speeding car before sending out the summons notice.
Cuba baca
berita ini, yang jika benar, tentunya "mendebarkan" hati SETIAP
agensi yang terlibat, termasuk saya (yang pernah berkhidmat sebagai Penasihat
Undang-undang agensi kerajaan dan pegawai penguatkuasaan agensi berkaitan
pengangkutan jalan)...
(Soalan:
Jika alat sedemikian efektif, ia cuma "bermanfaat" kepada orang yang
berupaya, mampu, dan tidak lupa, orang kerap "berlumba" di jalan
raya...dan tiada pihak yang dapt mengambil tindakan, kan?)
AES
Detector application is developed to assist drivers to detect the new launching
AES Camera. System will auto trigger
alert sound to remind you when detected any AES Camera within 1000 meter from
your driving point. Make sure you turn on your mobile phone speaker in order to
hear the alert sound. …
aes detector for blackberry
Aes detector
aes detector blackberry
download aes detector for blackberry
blackberry aes detector
AES detector application for blackberry
aes detactor for blackberry
AES detector for download for blackberry
aes detector malaysia
free download aes detector
http://aescameras.com/aes-detector/
(Diakses 18 November 2012)
Betul
tak, AES masih "menangkap" pemandu yang memandu 81 km/j di kawasan
had laju 80km/j, kan?
Betul
tak, masih terdapat banyak kawasan jalan yang had laju yang dikuatkuasakan
adalah "tak munasabah"? Contohnya, di kawasan yang dahulunya, tahun
1970an atau 1980an, memang sesuai dilatakkan tanda had laju 60 km/j, tetapi
jalan tersebut kini telah dilebarkan dan diluruskan, tetapi tahun 2000an masih
ditandakan 60 km/j, kan?
Atas
pelbagai isu dan anomali di atas, sepatutnya AES CUMA SESUAI di persimpangan
jalan sahaja, dan buat masa ini TIDAK SESUAI ditempatkan untuk mengawal had
laju pemanduan. Kehadiran pegawai agensi penguatkuasa masih relevan, masih
lebih sesuai, dan masih lebih berkesan, dan disamping itu, MEMPUNYAI INSANI dan
budibicara yang baik, berbanding AES...
Pihak berkuasa tentunya sedang dan akan membaiki kelemahan yang terbit
daripada pihak mereka sendiri, kan? Kita ini, KERAJAAN YANG BAIK, maka tentunya
kita semua mencari yang terbaik, sebab pada akhirnya, apa sistem dan kaedah
sekalipun, dan dalam apa jua bidang sekalipun, ia akan tertumpu dan menjurus
kepada menjaga kebajikan rakyat terbanyak, kan?
